<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RapLeaf: Social Media’s Trojan Horse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.motivelab.com/2007/09/11/rapleaf-social-media%e2%80%99s-trojan-horse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.motivelab.com/2007/09/11/rapleaf-social-media%e2%80%99s-trojan-horse/</link>
	<description>Social Marketing Group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:40:37 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Whyte</title>
		<link>http://www.motivelab.com/2007/09/11/rapleaf-social-media%e2%80%99s-trojan-horse/comment-page-1/#comment-379</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Whyte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 19:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motivelab.com/2007/09/11/rapleaf-social-media%e2%80%99s-trojan-horse/#comment-379</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I don’t want to learn the company behind the reputation software is gathering and selling much more than I thought I was sharing.&lt;/i&gt;

Exactly. The particularly worrying thing is that RapLeaf changed their privacy policy and made the change retroactive. Where early users of UpScoop were assured that the company would not &quot;email, contact, or spam any friends from an email address book&quot; nor would it &quot;sell, rent, or lease email addresses to partners&quot;, those promises were simply and cynically broken. 

It&#039;s interesting and, I think, significant that the published apology simply fails to mention that Upscoop addresses are handed over to rapleaf. The new privacy policy hints obliquely that it just might happen - &quot;Information captured via Upscoop may be used to assist Rapleaf’s services&quot; - it would be much more accurate to say &quot;Once you have given us all your friends&#039; contact details, we will create Rapleaf pages for all of them whether they like it or not&quot;, and their dissimulation on this point is hardly ethical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I don’t want to learn the company behind the reputation software is gathering and selling much more than I thought I was sharing.</i></p>
<p>Exactly. The particularly worrying thing is that RapLeaf changed their privacy policy and made the change retroactive. Where early users of UpScoop were assured that the company would not &#8220;email, contact, or spam any friends from an email address book&#8221; nor would it &#8220;sell, rent, or lease email addresses to partners&#8221;, those promises were simply and cynically broken. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting and, I think, significant that the published apology simply fails to mention that Upscoop addresses are handed over to rapleaf. The new privacy policy hints obliquely that it just might happen &#8211; &#8220;Information captured via Upscoop may be used to assist Rapleaf’s services&#8221; &#8211; it would be much more accurate to say &#8220;Once you have given us all your friends&#8217; contact details, we will create Rapleaf pages for all of them whether they like it or not&#8221;, and their dissimulation on this point is hardly ethical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
